The
Sunday,
September 28, 2003 -- An editorial in the Washington Times showcases
Landmark's complaint to the IRS and the Justice Department calling for the
revocation of the tax-exempt status of the Washington Teachers Union (WTU) and
the United Teachers of Dade County (UTDC) for systemic failures by both unions
to prevent widespread corruption on the part of each union's leadership.
When union corruption is massive, pervasive and systemic, and labor leaders
repeatedly fail to perform their fiduciary duties, should the labor
organization forfeit its tax-exempt status?
Landmark Legal Foundation makes a persuasive case that the corruption-plagued
Washington Teachers Union (WTU) and the crime-infested United Teachers of Dade
County (UTDC) in South Florida deserve to forfeit their tax-exempt status. Both
local unions are affiliates of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). The
parent organization was so blind that the WTU's
corruption spanned nearly seven years.
Landmark, which has spent years investigating and uncovering political and
financial abuses of the nation's largest teachers' unions and their affiliates,
has filed a complaint with both the IRS and Tax Division of the Department of
Justice, seeking the revocation of the non-profit tax status of both the WTU
and the UTDC.
Meticulously documenting its case, Landmark provides persuasive evidence
that "officers of the WTU and UTDC, while acting in their official
capacities, compromised the tax-exempt status of their unions by engaging in an
ongoing pattern of fraud, self-dealing, money-laundering and conspiracy."
Citing Internal Revenue Code sections that specifically prohibit 501(c)(5) labor organizations from utilizing the
"earnings" of the union for the benefit of "any member,"
Landmark conclusively demonstrates how former
Landmark also notes that
Landmark's complaint cites the 2001 Exempt Organizations Text, which
declares that, when a 501(c)(5) organization pays
"unreasonable compensation to individuals that retain 'substantial
influence,' such organization will jeopardize its exempt status based on
inurement," which "arises from the misuse of control over the
organization." The wholesale looting of these unions could occur only when
other officials willfully or negligently failed to perform duties that could
have easily prevented the abuse. Landmark's case has substantial merit.