Border Security & Sanctuary City

Landmark Announces Angel Family Representation

Border Security

&  Sanctuary City

We are very proud and humbled to announce that Landmark Legal Foundation is representing a group of Angel Families — families who have lost loved ones to crimes committed by individuals who are in the United States illegally.  

 

We have filed a friend of the court brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit defending the Trump Administration's emergency declaration funding for border barrier construction.

 

These Angel Families bear witness to the tragic consequences that can result from a border that is not secure, especially when so-called sanctuary states and cities obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts.

Read the amicus brief here.

Read the press release here.

 

Preserving the Constitution

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Process For Protecting The Integrity Of Its Voter Rolls

Preserving the Constitution

Read the OpEd in USA Today by Landmark's President Pete Hutchison here.

​Landmark's amicus brief in support of the State of Ohio is available here.

Listen to Landmark's President Pete Hutchison's Interview on the Mark Levin Show.

Janus v. AFSCME: High Court Restores First Amendment Rights to Public Employees

Preserving the Constitution

Read Landmark's Scotusblog Analysis here.

Read Landmark's Brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Files Amicus Brief in Support of Seila Law LLC

Preserving the Constitution

Read the brief here.

View the Affidavit of Service here. 

View the Certificate of Compliance here.

Landmark Chairman Mark Levin Addresses The Mueller Report

Preserving the Constitution

Watch the video here.

Landmark urges the Supreme Court to decide whether Massachusetts’s ban on corporate political spending violates the First Amendment

Preserving the Constitution

View the brief here.

Landmark Files Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners in State National Bank of Big Springs, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al.

Preserving the Constitution

View the brief here.

 
Mark Levin Show_Husted InterviewArtist Name
00:00 / 10:08

Voter Integrity

Landmark and PILF File Joint Brief  Supporting Ballot Integrity in Texas

Voter Integrity

View the brief here.

Landmark Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Arizona Ballot Harvesting Protections

Voter Integrity

View the brief here.

Texas Voting Laws Defended by Landmark and PILF

Voter Integrity

View the brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Defends Virginia Voting Protections Even Though The Commonwealth Won't.

Voter Integrity

View Landmark's blog post here.

View the brief here.

Landmark Legal Foundation Requests Federal Investigation Into California Voter Registration Improprieties

Voter Integrity

View Landmark's press release here.

​View the executive summary here.

View the complaint here.

View the exhibits here.

LANDMARK OPED: Calif. Ignores Non-Citizen Voter Registrations

Voter Integrity

View the article here.

Landmark Files Complaint With California Dept. of Motor Vehicles For Failure To Maintain Accurate Voter Rolls

Voter Integrity

View the complaint here.

Landmark Investigation Pressures California DMV To Consider Freezing Motor Voter Registration

Voter Integrity

View the article here.

Landmark Files Public Records Act Request With California For Records Regarding Voter Registrations Submitted Through The California DMV

Voter Integrity

View the document here.

Landmark's California Voter Registration Investigation

Voter Integrity

Landmark files complaint with the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security Re: California's Failure to Maintain Accurate Voter Rolls.

View the complaint here.

View exhibits 1-5

View exhibits 6 part 1

View exhibit 6 part 2

View exhibits 7-9

 

Archive

Landmark Legal Foundation seeks probe of leaks about investigations into Trump campaign ties to Russia

April 26, 2017

Landmark Legal Foundation announced today that it has asked the inspectors general of six federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to investigate dozens of illegal leaks to journalists of classified information relating to electronic surveillance of individuals associated with the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump.

Supplemental Request for Investigation

July 25, 2017

Request for investigation, leaking surveillance activity conducted in accordance with foreign intelligence surveillance court warrants.

Memo in support of motion for en banc order directing investigation

April 19, 2017

What's this item about? WhatAmicus Curiae Landmark Legal Foundation (Landmark) respectfully moves this court to exercise its authority pursuant to 50 U.S.C. Section 1803(a)(2)(A) to consider “exceptional matters” en banc, and its inherent authority under the Constitution of the United States, and issue all orders necessary to protect the administration of justice, including an order to direct a full investigation into the leaking of surveillance activity conducted in accordance with the rulings of this court. Landmark does not seek to join any matter before this Court, but respectfully appears as a friend of the Court. makes it interesting? Write a catchy description to grab your audience's attention...

Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections Demand Letter

September 20, 2016

Landmark Legal Foundation recently sent this demand letter to the Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections. The Foundation demanded that the Board distribute to Virginia's 113 voting registrars the latest data on voting record changes assembled by Crosscheck, an organization to which 25 member states supply the latest updates to voting records generated by individuals who die, move, change their names, are convicted of felonies, or otherwise change their voting registrations. The majority of the members of Virginia Board of Elections is opposed to doing this.

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Landmark Legal.org ("Landmark") or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Landmark.  Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Landmark. 

No Legal Advice Intended:  This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments.  Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments.  These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances.  You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. 

Third Party Websites:  As a convenience, this website may provide links to third-party websites.  Such linked websites are not under the control of Landmark Legal Foundation or Landmark Legal.org ("Landmark"), and Landmark assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites. 

© 2020 by Landmark Legal Foundation