Border Security & Sanctuary City
Landmark Announces Angel Family Representation
Border Security
& Sanctuary City
We are very proud and humbled to announce that Landmark Legal Foundation is representing a group of Angel Families — families who have lost loved ones to crimes committed by individuals who are in the United States illegally.
We have filed a friend of the court brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit defending the Trump Administration's emergency declaration funding for border barrier construction.
These Angel Families bear witness to the tragic consequences that can result from a border that is not secure, especially when so-called sanctuary states and cities obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts.
Read the amicus brief here.
Read the press release here.
Preserving the Constitution
Landmark Fights for Donor Privacy
Preserving the Constitution
Your privacy is of the highest concern to Landmark Legal Foundation. That is why we joined 38 conservative legal and public policy organizations in challenging new rules imposed by the states of California and New York that will compel charitable organizations to release personal information of their largest financial supporters. We argue that these regulations violated your First Amendment rights to free speech and association. The case is Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra and you can read the brief the Foundation joined here.
U.S. Supreme Court Weighs Compelled Employee Financial Support of Public Sector Unions
Preserving the Constitution
Landmark joined other freedom based legal groups and organizations supporting the rights of public employees wanting freedom from compelled financial support of public sector labor unions and their radical political agenda. The case is Thompson v. Marietta Education Association and you can read the brief here.
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Process For Protecting The Integrity Of Its Voter Rolls
Preserving the Constitution
Read the OpEd in USA Today by Landmark's President Pete Hutchison here.
Landmark's amicus brief in support of the State of Ohio is available here.
Listen to Landmark's President Pete Hutchison's Interview on the Mark Levin Show.
Landmark Chairman Mark Levin Addresses The Mueller Report
Preserving the Constitution
Watch the video here.
Landmark urges the Supreme Court to decide whether Massachusetts’s ban on corporate political spending violates the First Amendment
Preserving the Constitution
View the brief here.
Landmark Files Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners in State National Bank of Big Springs, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al.
Preserving the Constitution
View the brief here.
Voter Integrity
Landmark and PILF File Joint Brief Supporting Ballot Integrity in Texas
Voter Integrity
Landmark Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Arizona Ballot Harvesting Protections
Voter Integrity
Landmark Files Complaint With California Dept. of Motor Vehicles For Failure To Maintain Accurate Voter Rolls
Voter Integrity
View the complaint here.
Landmark Investigation Pressures California DMV To Consider Freezing Motor Voter Registration
Voter Integrity
View the article here.
Landmark Files Public Records Act Request With California For Records Regarding Voter Registrations Submitted Through The California DMV
Voter Integrity
View the document here.
Landmark's California Voter Registration Investigation
Voter Integrity
Archive
Landmark Legal Foundation seeks probe of leaks about investigations into Trump campaign ties to Russia
April 26, 2017
Landmark Legal Foundation announced today that it has asked the inspectors general of six federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to investigate dozens of illegal leaks to journalists of classified information relating to electronic surveillance of individuals associated with the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump.
Supplemental Request for Investigation
July 25, 2017
Request for investigation, leaking surveillance activity conducted in accordance with foreign intelligence surveillance court warrants.
Memo in support of motion for en banc order directing investigation
April 19, 2017
What's this item about? WhatAmicus Curiae Landmark Legal Foundation (Landmark) respectfully moves this court to exercise its authority pursuant to 50 U.S.C. Section 1803(a)(2)(A) to consider “exceptional matters” en banc, and its inherent authority under the Constitution of the United States, and issue all orders necessary to protect the administration of justice, including an order to direct a full investigation into the leaking of surveillance activity conducted in accordance with the rulings of this court. Landmark does not seek to join any matter before this Court, but respectfully appears as a friend of the Court. makes it interesting? Write a catchy description to grab your audience's attention...
Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections Demand Letter
September 20, 2016
Landmark Legal Foundation recently sent this demand letter to the Virginia Commonwealth Board of Elections. The Foundation demanded that the Board distribute to Virginia's 113 voting registrars the latest data on voting record changes assembled by Crosscheck, an organization to which 25 member states supply the latest updates to voting records generated by individuals who die, move, change their names, are convicted of felonies, or otherwise change their voting registrations. The majority of the members of Virginia Board of Elections is opposed to doing this.